San Antonio, TX · Military City, USA UEI L58JZMKRCLM5  ·  CAGE 203C1  ·  NAICS 541511  ·  SAM.gov Active

Read this first: these are the ones somebody found. No agency that operates a license plate reader in Bexar County publishes where they are, so there is no total to compare this against and no coverage rate can be calculated. 547 is a floor. The real number is unknown, and larger.

547plate readers mapped by volunteers in Bexar County
504of them are Flock Safety, 92% of the total
86%have no operator recorded, so who runs them is mostly unknown
214sit outside San Antonio city limits, in the surrounding towns

Nobody official will tell you this

The City of San Antonio publishes 166 open datasets and runs a public GIS service with hundreds of layers. Not one of them is a camera. There is no inventory, no count, and no map of these devices from any agency that operates them. What is on this page came from volunteers walking and driving around and recording what they saw, in OpenStreetMap.

Where the mapped readers are

Flock Safety other makes San Antonio council districts

Every mapped reader is drawn, including the 214 outside the shaded city area: Live Oak, Universal City, Converse, Selma and Windcrest run their own. A dot means a volunteer recorded a device there on some date. It is not a claim that it is still there, and it says nothing about what the device does.

Who operates them is mostly not recorded

This is the single most important gap in the data. Of 547 mapped readers, 471 carry no operator at all. Only 14 distinct operators are named across the rest.

Recorded operators of mapped license plate readers
OperatorReaders
Live Oak20
Universal City12
Converse7
Lowe's7
Academy Sports + Outdoors5
The Home Depot5
Terrell Hills5
Selma4
City of Windcrest TX3
Windcrest3
VILLAGE GREEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION2
City of Live Oak1
Not recorded471

No figure on this page supports a sentence of the form "the police department operates N cameras". The record does not say. Note also that not every operator here is a police force: retailers and private businesses appear in this list, and a camera in a shop car park is a different thing from one on a public road.

The operator field is free text, so the same body can appear under more than one spelling. They are listed exactly as tagged rather than merged, because deciding which spellings are the same organisation would be our judgement rather than the record's.

What was mapped, and by whom

Manufacturers of mapped license plate readers
ManufacturerReadersShare of mapped
Flock Safety50492.1%
(not recorded)234.2%
Motorola Solutions122.2%
Rekor40.7%
Axon Enterprise30.5%
Genetec10.2%

Share of what has been mapped, never a share of what exists.

How current this is

Contributor edits run from 2024-11-13 to 2026-09-03, and 462 of the 547 were touched in the last twelve months. A record is a volunteer observation with a date on it, so the map lags both installations and removals.

Look at it closely

The map loads on demand. Until you press the button, no map service is contacted.

Take the data

Counts as CSV, the full cube as JSON, or through the public API. Source: OpenStreetMap contributors, retrieved 2026-09-04, licensed ODbL 1.0. Unlike the government records behind the other tools on this site, this data is not public domain: anything you derive from it carries the same license and the same attribution requirement. Cite it as: OpenStreetMap contributors, via brandshyp.org.

What this page is, and is not

An inventory, assembled from the only public source that exists.

An automated license plate reader photographs every passing number plate, converts it to text, and records it with a time and a place. They are mounted on poles at junctions and approach roads. Flock Safety is the largest vendor in this market and sells to police departments, homeowner associations and private businesses alike.

This page takes no position on whether they should be there. It answers a narrower question: what is on the public record, and what is missing from it. Every other tool on this site audits a government dataset. Here there is no government dataset to audit. What exists instead is OpenStreetMap, where volunteers, many working through the DeFlock project, have recorded devices they observed. That is a genuine public record and it is checkable: every point can be inspected, edited and disputed by anyone. It is also, unavoidably, incomplete.

Read this before you quote a number from it

This is the weakest evidence base of any tool on this site, and that is worth being blunt about.

There is no denominator, and that is different from the usual complaint

Elsewhere on this site the phrase means there is no traffic count to divide by. Here it is worse: nobody publishes how many readers exist, so there is no total to compare the mapped ones against and no coverage rate can be worked out at all. Every count here is a floor.

Who operates them is mostly unrecorded

Most mapped readers carry no operator tag. No number here supports a sentence of the form “the police department runs N cameras”, and nothing should be read that way. Some tagged operators are private businesses rather than any police force.

Presence only, never behavior

A record means somebody saw a device at a place on a date. It says nothing about what any camera records, how long anything is kept, who it is shared with, or whether it is switched on. None of that is in this data and none of it is inferred here.

Plate readers only

The filter is devices tagged as automated plate readers. Ordinary surveillance cameras are excluded, including those around federal facilities, which are not published on this page.

Seen one that is not on the map?

The count is a floor, and the only people who can raise it are the ones who drive past these things.

Every reader on the map was put there by a volunteer who noticed one. No agency publishes a list to check that against, so the map is not a census and cannot become one. What it can be is less incomplete. The form below records a sighting in a way that keeps every refusal this page already makes: it asks for a part of town rather than an address, it does not ask which way the camera faces, and it does not ask you to guess who operates it.

Seen one that is not on the map? Tell us roughly where and what it looked like. Every answer is a fixed choice: there is no field for an address, and the form does not ask which way the camera faces or who runs it.

Most readers in this county carry a maker's name on the housing. "Not sure" is a perfectly good answer and is recorded as such.

Read by us, never published. Please do not include number plates, phone numbers, email addresses or links: the form refuses them.

What happens to it. A sighting is an unverified statement by somebody we cannot identify, so it is counted separately and never joins the mapped inventory above: that count comes from OpenStreetMap contributors and stays as it is. Nothing is published per part of town until 25 sightings exist. The map remains a floor either way, because no agency publishes a count to check it against.

Why an IT contractor built this

Because the interesting problem is not the map, it is the absence. A city can publish 166 datasets and hundreds of GIS layers and still have nothing at all to say about a network of several hundred cameras. Finding that out took one query against the catalog and one against the GIS services, and the answer was zero both times. Working out what a record cannot support is the same discipline whether the record is a permit file, a dispatch log or an empty shelf. Nobody commissioned this page and there is nothing to buy on it.

Share it with someone who assumes this is public.

Free, no signup. Every figure is a floor, because no agency publishes a total to measure it against.

Facebook LinkedIn X WhatsApp Email

Other San Antonio tools

Same method, a different public record. Each one states what its record cannot answer.

Crime Map Building Permits Bar & Restaurant Revenue Aggressive Driving Trail Accessibility License Plate Readers Data Centers Data Center Zoning 311 Response Times Data Center Corroboration Data Center Environmental Record Bond Projects Council District Lookup Sheriff Response Times County Capital Projects Police Response Times Missing Children Records

All 17 are free, with no signup and no email wall, and the public API behind them needs no key.

Who publishes this

These tools are built and maintained by BrandShyp LLC, a San Antonio software firm. We sell data, software and accessibility work to public agencies and are seeking state and local government contracts. Small business certification with the South Central Texas Regional Certification Agency is in process. We hold no City of San Antonio contract.

No client, agency or sponsor funds, reviews or approves any of these tools, and nothing on these pages is a solicitation. Every figure comes from the public record named below, which is linked and can be queried without us.

Corrections. If a number here disagrees with the record, write to Justice Harker at [email protected] with the figure and the source that contradicts it. Corrections are made on the page, and what changed is noted there rather than replaced silently.

Source. This page reads OpenStreetMap, a volunteer mapping project, and not a government record. The record is linked from the page above and can be queried without us. It is published by OpenStreetMap contributors under the Open Database License, so attribution travels with the data and any database derived from it inherits the same license.