San Antonio, TX · Military City, USA UEI L58JZMKRCLM5  ·  CAGE 203C1  ·  NAICS 541511  ·  SAM.gov Active

Map a finding to its controls

Works on rule IDs (V-230468), STIG IDs (RHEL-08-030601), CCIs (CCI-000169), keywords, or a whole .ckl pasted straight in.

Why this tool shows its work

Every hop is a lookup, not a guess

A STIG rule already carries one or more Control Correlation Identifiers. DISA publishes the CCI List; NIST publishes the 800-53 catalog. So the path from a scan finding to a security control is a deterministic chain — rule, to CCI, to control — and it can be reproduced by anyone with the same public files.

That is the whole design. Nothing here is inferred and no language model is involved. If the tool tells you a finding maps to AU-12, it will also tell you which CCI carried it there, so you can check the claim rather than trust it.

And where the published crosswalk falls down, it says so

Two things a mapper should be honest about, and most are not.

Some rules resolve only to CM-6, Configuration Settings, through CCI-000366 — DISA’s general catch-all. That answer is technically correct and tells you almost nothing about the actual risk. When it happens, this tool flags it instead of presenting it as a precise mapping.

And a share of CCIs carry no Rev 5 reference at all, only Rev 4. The renumbering between revisions is not always cosmetic, so those are flagged too, rather than silently forwarded into a Rev 5 report where a wrong control would be invisible.

What this tool is not

It resolves the published crosswalk. It does not assess you, it does not judge whether a control is satisfied, and it is not evidence of compliance. Mapping a finding to a control is the easy half — a lookup. Deciding whether your implementation actually satisfies that control, writing the evidence down, and defending it to an assessor is the hard half, and no tool does it for you.

The hard half

We do this for a living

BrandShyp took its own systems through a 110-requirement NIST SP 800-171 self-assessment, built the automation that generates the SSP and POA&M from a machine-readable control store, stood up a FIPS-mode isolated enclave for CUI, and affirmed a CMMC Level 2 (Self) posture in SPRS. We are the same kind of small defense-adjacent firm we work with, and we have run the process end to end on ourselves.

Related free tools

SPRS Score Calculator

Work out your NIST 800-171 SPRS score the way the DoD scoring methodology actually counts it, weighted deductions and all.

POA&M Builder

Walk all 110 requirements, mark your gaps, and export a clean Plan of Action & Milestones you can actually maintain.

CMMC Fit Check

Two minutes to find out which CMMC level applies to you — and, honestly, whether it applies at all.