San Antonio Council District Lookup
Find your council district from your address, then see what the City’s own record holds for it: service requests measured against the City’s own deadline, building permits, bond spending and sidewalk coverage. No signup, and your address never reaches this site.
Find your council district
Type an address to get your council district and your ZIP code, then what the City record holds for that district. San Antonio is assumed if you leave the city off.
Your address goes straight from your browser to the US Census Bureau geocoder. It is not sent to this site, not stored, and not logged here.
Two different shapes, and neither fits inside the other
The City files service requests, building permits, bond projects and zoning by council district. It publishes police offences by ZIP code. A ZIP code does not sit inside a council district and a council district does not sit inside a ZIP code, so there is no single map of your area and this page does not invent one. Everything below is by council district. For the crime record, the crime map works by ZIP and the lookup above will hand you yours.
What the City record holds, by district
Ordered by district number. This is not a ranking and there is no score. The columns come from five different City records that count different things over different periods, and a single combined figure would have no unit and nothing to check it against.
| District | 311 requests | Past the City deadline | Permit records | Permits with a price | Bond approved | Bond spent | Sidewalk recorded missing | Sidewalk widths never measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District 1 | 55,418 | 9.9% | 54,703 | 3.1% | $329.3M | $239.9M (72.9%) | 25.2% | 11.1% |
| District 2 | 51,634 | 11.3% | 59,094 | 2.9% | $137.7M | $81.8M (59.4%) | 20.3% | 10.6% |
| District 3 | 52,448 | 10.1% | 45,407 | 2.7% | $206.3M | $110.5M (53.6%) | 30.4% | 12.2% |
| District 4 | 42,210 | 10.6% | 43,059 | 2.9% | $147.9M | $85.8M (58.0%) | 17.4% | 8.0% |
| District 5 | 59,032 | 12.1% | 29,666 | 2.2% | $145.4M | $64.8M (44.5%) | 11.6% | 11.0% |
| District 6 | 31,367 | 9.3% | 36,981 | 4.7% | $107.4M | $55.3M (51.4%) | 8.0% | 15.7% |
| District 7 | 40,440 | 9.2% | 37,445 | 2.7% | $108.1M | $53.3M (49.3%) | 29.7% | 18.1% |
| District 8 | 22,416 | 9.0% | 45,472 | 4.6% | $127.3M | $72.9M (57.3%) | 13.1% | 41.0% |
| District 9 | 22,574 | 8.9% | 48,175 | 2.9% | $119.9M | $63.4M (52.9%) | 16.3% | 14.7% |
| District 10 | 34,866 | 9.8% | 51,814 | 2.5% | $108.4M | $47.4M (43.7%) | 16.8% | 16.4% |
Reading this table. More 311 requests does not mean a district is worse served; it may simply mean more people called. More recorded permit valuation does not mean more building; it may mean the price field was filled in more often, which is what the fifth column is for. A district showing few sidewalks under 36 inches may have wide sidewalks or may have unmeasured ones, which is what the last column is for. Council District 0 is not a council district: it is the value the City writes when a record cannot be placed, and it is excluded here.
Where the City misses its own deadline most, citywide
These are citywide figures, not district figures. The City records a district and a late flag on every request but does not publish a rate for each request type within each district, so no such number is computed here.
| Request type | The City gives itself | Requests | Past that deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homeless Encampment | 21 days | 2,267 | 72.2% |
| Traffic Signals (New Signal) | 85 days | 480 | 60.4% |
| Out of Cycle(Garbage/Leaves w Fee) | 9 days | 4,198 | 59.6% |
| Services/Fees Info (Fees/Charges) | 5 days | 981 | 59.2% |
| Traffic Signals (Engineering) | 85 days | 364 | 58.5% |
| Trapped/Confined | 1 day | 4,973 | 57.6% |
| Animal Bite(Non-Critical) | 10 days | 2,331 | 52.6% |
| Animal Bite(Critical) | 10 days | 684 | 51.8% |
| Carts(Placement) | 2 days | 533 | 49.2% |
| Dockless Vehicle | 0 days | 806 | 39.0% |
Read every rate beside the deadline next to it. A type the City gives itself sixty days for and a type it gives itself one day for are not comparable, and the fuller record is on the 311 response times page.
Where each column comes from, and how old it is
Nothing on this page is fetched from a government record directly except the district boundaries. Every figure is copied from another tool on this site and carries that tool's own build date, so a column here can be older than this page.
- The 311 columns come from tool #9 311 Response Times, built 29 August 2026.
- The permit columns come from tool #2 Building Permits, built 29 August 2026.
- The bond columns come from tool #12 Bond Projects, built 30 August 2026.
- The sidewalk columns come from tool #5 Trail Accessibility, built 24 August 2026.
- Data centre eligible acreage come from tool #8 Data Center Zoning, built 29 August 2026.
What this page does not publish
- No score, grade, ranking or index of districts is computed anywhere in this tool.
- No crime figure. That record is published by ZIP code, not by council district, and is linked to the crime map instead of being repeated or re-scored here.
- No per-district rate for an individual request type. The City publishes a district and a late flag on each request but not that cross-tabulation, and it is not derived here.
Caveats
- A council district and a ZIP code are different shapes and neither one nests inside the other. This page answers by council district, because that is the geography the City files its own service requests, permits, bond projects and zoning in. The crime record is published by ZIP and is linked rather than repeated here.
- Nothing on this page is a score, a grade or a ranking. The districts are listed in numerical order and are never sorted by any measure on the page. A single number combining a service-request rate with a sidewalk measurement and an acreage would have no unit and no source to check it against.
- Council District 0 is not a council district. It is the value the City writes when a record cannot be placed in one, it carries a large share of all 311 service requests, and it is excluded from every figure here.
- A service-request rate is never printed without the deadline the City set for that request type. The rate measures how generous a deadline the City wrote itself at least as much as it measures effort.
- The worst-performing request types listed are citywide. The City publishes a late flag and a district on each request, but not a per-district rate for each request type, so no such figure is computed here.
- The district boundaries used by the address lookup are simplified by about ten metres against the City’s own outline. An address within about ten metres of a district line, which usually means one straddling the boundary street, should be checked against the City map.
- Every figure here is copied from a sibling tool on this site and carries that tool's own build date. A figure can be a month older than this page.
Take the data: CSV. Built 31 August 2026.
Share it with a neighbour.
Why there is no single score for your area
The obvious version of this page ranks the ten districts best to worst. It is not built, and the reason is not squeamishness.
The columns on this page come from five different City records. A service request is counted when somebody phones; a building permit is counted when somebody files; a bond project is counted when Council approves one; a sidewalk segment is counted when a surveyor walks it. They cover different periods, they are collected by different departments for different reasons, and they are not measured in units that can be added together.
A combined score would therefore be a number with no unit, no source, and nothing to check it against. Its ordering would be decided entirely by how we chose to weight the columns, and that choice would be invisible to a reader while looking exactly as authoritative as the figures underneath it. On a page about named places where real people live and buy homes, an unfounded ordering is not a harmless simplification.
So the districts are printed in numerical order and there is no sort control. What is compared, in the second table, is the City against its own published deadlines. That comparison is legitimate because the City set both sides of it.
A council district and a ZIP code are not the same shape
This is the thing that makes a single map of “your area” impossible, and it is worth stating plainly.
The City of San Antonio files its 311 service requests, its building permits, its bond projects and its zoning by council district. There are ten of them, they are redrawn after each census, and they are the unit the City uses to answer to residents.
The San Antonio Police Department publishes its offence record by ZIP code, and nothing finer: there is no street address and no coordinate in the open crime data at all. ZIP codes are drawn by the Postal Service for delivery routes and have no relationship to council boundaries. One district contains parts of many ZIPs, and one ZIP straddles several districts.
There is no crosswalk between them that this record supports, so this page does not invent one. It answers by council district, and hands you your ZIP so you can take it to the tool that holds the crime record. Both answers come out of the same address lookup, and neither is converted into the other.
What this page cannot tell you
Every tool on this site publishes its limits beside its figures. These are this one’s.
It cannot tell you whether a district is a good place to live. It reports what four City records contain. Whether a neighbourhood suits you is not in any of them.
It cannot tell you how a particular request type performs in your district. The City records a district and a late flag on every service request, but it does not publish the rate for each request type within each district, and that cross-tabulation is not derived here. The worst-performing types listed are citywide.
It cannot settle an address on a boundary. The district outlines used by the lookup are generalised by roughly one hundred metres, which is fine for placing a house and is not fine for placing a property line.
It is not current to the day. Every figure is copied from another tool on this site and carries that tool’s own build date, listed above. A column can be a month older than the page around it.
A recorded zero is not always a real zero. Each source record has its own version of this problem, described on its own page: a sidewalk width of zero means the width was never measured, and a bond budget of zero may mean the project cost nothing or may mean nobody recorded what it cost.
Who this is for
Residents, mostly. Somebody who has just moved, or is about to, and wants to know which of the ten districts they will be calling when a streetlight goes out and how quickly that call has historically been answered. The City publishes all of this and publishes none of it together.
Nobody commissioned this page, no agency reviewed it before publication, and there is nothing to buy on it.
Other San Antonio tools
Same method, a different public record. Each one states what its record cannot answer.
Crime Map Building Permits Bar & Restaurant Revenue Aggressive Driving Trail Accessibility Licence Plate Readers Data Centers Data Center Zoning 311 Response Times Data Center Corroboration Data Center Environmental Record Bond Projects Council District Lookup
All 13 are free, with no signup and no email wall, and the public API behind them needs no key.
Who publishes this
These tools are built and maintained by BrandShyp LLC, a San Antonio software and data firm. We sell data, software and accessibility work to public agencies and are seeking state and local government contracts. Small business certification with the South Central Texas Regional Certification Agency is in process. We hold no City of San Antonio contract.
No client, agency or sponsor funds, reviews or approves any of these tools, and nothing on these pages is a solicitation. Every figure comes from the public record named below, which is linked and can be queried without us.
Corrections. If a number here disagrees with the record, write to Justice Harker at [email protected] with the figure and the source that contradicts it. Corrections are made on the page, and what changed is noted there rather than replaced silently.
Source. This page reads the City of San Antonio council district boundaries, and the records the other tools on this site already read. The record is linked from the page above and can be queried without us. We claim no rights over the underlying record and add no licence of our own to it.